TY - JOUR
T1 - Disruption of cortical synaptic homeostasis in individuals with chronic low back pain
AU - Thapa, Tribikram
AU - Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
AU - Chipchase, Lucinda S.
AU - Schabrun, Siobhan M.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective: Homeostatic plasticity mechanisms regulate synaptic plasticity in the human brain. Impaired homeostatic plasticity may contribute to maladaptive synaptic plasticity and symptom persistence in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We examined homeostatic plasticity in fifty individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP) and twenty-five pain-free controls. A single block (7-min) of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation ('single tDCS'), or two subsequent blocks (7-min and 5-min separated by 3-min rest; 'double tDCS'), were randomised across two experimental sessions to confirm an excitatory response to tDCS applied alone, and evaluate homeostatic plasticity, respectively. Corticomotor excitability was assessed in the corticomotor representation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded before and 0, 10, 20, and 30-min following each tDCS protocol. Results: Compared with baseline, MEP amplitudes increased at all time points in both groups following the single tDCS protocol (P < 0.003). Following the double tDCS protocol, MEP amplitudes decreased in pain-free controls at all time points compared with baseline (P < 0.01), and were unchanged in the cLBP group. Conclusion: These data indicate impaired homeostatic plasticity in the primary motor cortex of individuals with cLBP. Significance: Impaired homeostatic plasticity could explain maladaptive synaptic plasticity and symptom persistence in cLBP.
AB - Objective: Homeostatic plasticity mechanisms regulate synaptic plasticity in the human brain. Impaired homeostatic plasticity may contribute to maladaptive synaptic plasticity and symptom persistence in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We examined homeostatic plasticity in fifty individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP) and twenty-five pain-free controls. A single block (7-min) of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation ('single tDCS'), or two subsequent blocks (7-min and 5-min separated by 3-min rest; 'double tDCS'), were randomised across two experimental sessions to confirm an excitatory response to tDCS applied alone, and evaluate homeostatic plasticity, respectively. Corticomotor excitability was assessed in the corticomotor representation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded before and 0, 10, 20, and 30-min following each tDCS protocol. Results: Compared with baseline, MEP amplitudes increased at all time points in both groups following the single tDCS protocol (P < 0.003). Following the double tDCS protocol, MEP amplitudes decreased in pain-free controls at all time points compared with baseline (P < 0.01), and were unchanged in the cLBP group. Conclusion: These data indicate impaired homeostatic plasticity in the primary motor cortex of individuals with cLBP. Significance: Impaired homeostatic plasticity could explain maladaptive synaptic plasticity and symptom persistence in cLBP.
KW - backache
KW - chronic pain
KW - magnetic brain stimulation
KW - motor cortex
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:46047
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.060
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.060
M3 - Article
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 129
SP - 1090
EP - 1096
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 5
ER -