Disturbing professional practice discourse : re: writing practices

Sheridan Linnell, Debbie Horfall

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

From a sociological and poststructural viewpoint, professional practice discourse is a productive set of relations that makes practice possible, including many progressive, supportive and creative ways of practising professionally. At the same time, even progressive iterations of the discourse tend to reflect and sustain already established power relationships and limit the possibilities of thinking/doing “otherwise” (Foucault, 2000). Writing marginalia into the professional practice discourse is a political act intended to unsettle this tendency towards establishing and reinforcing dominant power relations, so that something different that we are yet to even envisage may emerge. To enable established and sedimented truths to move, we may need to unsettle not only content but also form: in particular, the forms of re-presentation that reinforce and construct the domain of professional practice and its limits. Doing writing as an enquiry (Richardson & St Pierre, 2005) into dominant and taken-for-granted assumptions and practices can disturb those discourses which further marginalise and pathologies those who are already most marginalised in society. In the chapter we write onto and into professional practice discourse through a collaborative dialogical process that we call just writing. We expand this phrase beyond its suggestion of spontaneous creative writing in order to link our writing practices with our passion for social justice – with writing for justice.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProfessional Practice Discourse Marginalia
EditorsJoy Higgs, Franziska Trede
Place of PublicationNetherlands
PublisherSense Publishers
Pages83-90
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9789463006002
ISBN (Print)9789463005999
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • professional practice
  • discourses
  • writing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disturbing professional practice discourse : re: writing practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this