TY - JOUR
T1 - Do delays in radiology lead to breaches in the 4-hour rule?
AU - Tse, R.
AU - Thompson, N.
AU - Moscova, M.
AU - Sindhusake, D.
AU - Shetty, A.
AU - Young, N.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Aim: To assess trends in medical imaging requests before and after the 4-hour rule commenced and to assess the imaging time component of emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of ED patients and imaging requests 1 year prior to and 3 years after implementation of the 4-hour rule (April to December for 2011e2014) was performed at a single adult tertiary referral Level 1 trauma hospital with Level 6 ED. Logistic regression was used to evaluate trends in the number of ED patient presentations, patient triage categories, and imaging requests for these patients. The imaging component of the total ED LOS was compared for patients who met the 4-hour target and patients who did not. Results: Compared to 2011 (before the 4-hour rule), ED presentations increased 4.74% in 2012, 12.7% in 2013, 21.28% in 2014 (p<0.01). Total imaging requests increased 23.05% in 2012, 48.04% in 2013, 60.77% in 2014 (p<0.01). For patients breaching the 4-hour rule, the mean time before radiology request was 2.4-2.8 hours; mean time from imaging request to completion was 1.2-1.3 hours; mean time from imaging completion to discharge from ED was the longest component of ED LOS (4.9-5.9 hours). Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in imaging requests, with a trend towards more CT and less radiography requests. Imaging requests for patients who breached the 4-hour target were made on average 2.4-2.8 hours after triage and average time after imaging in itself, exceeded 4 hours. Imaging is not likely a causative factor for patients breaching the 4-hour target.
AB - Aim: To assess trends in medical imaging requests before and after the 4-hour rule commenced and to assess the imaging time component of emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of ED patients and imaging requests 1 year prior to and 3 years after implementation of the 4-hour rule (April to December for 2011e2014) was performed at a single adult tertiary referral Level 1 trauma hospital with Level 6 ED. Logistic regression was used to evaluate trends in the number of ED patient presentations, patient triage categories, and imaging requests for these patients. The imaging component of the total ED LOS was compared for patients who met the 4-hour target and patients who did not. Results: Compared to 2011 (before the 4-hour rule), ED presentations increased 4.74% in 2012, 12.7% in 2013, 21.28% in 2014 (p<0.01). Total imaging requests increased 23.05% in 2012, 48.04% in 2013, 60.77% in 2014 (p<0.01). For patients breaching the 4-hour rule, the mean time before radiology request was 2.4-2.8 hours; mean time from imaging request to completion was 1.2-1.3 hours; mean time from imaging completion to discharge from ED was the longest component of ED LOS (4.9-5.9 hours). Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in imaging requests, with a trend towards more CT and less radiography requests. Imaging requests for patients who breached the 4-hour target were made on average 2.4-2.8 hours after triage and average time after imaging in itself, exceeded 4 hours. Imaging is not likely a causative factor for patients breaching the 4-hour target.
KW - diagnostic imaging
KW - hospital care
KW - radiology
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:34323
U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.008
DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.008
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-229X
SN - 0009-9260
VL - 71
SP - 523
EP - 531
JO - Clinical Radiology
JF - Clinical Radiology
IS - 6
ER -