TY - JOUR
T1 - Documentation of advance care planning in early phase cancer clinical trials
T2 - an Australian single-centre experience
AU - Huang, Nancy
AU - Descallar, Joseph
AU - Vo, Samuel
AU - Lee, Su Saint
AU - Wilkinson, Kate
AU - Roohullah, Aflah
AU - Cooper, Adam
AU - Bray, Victoria
AU - Chua, Wei
AU - Ní Chróinín, Danielle
AU - Pal, Abhijit
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Background/Objectives: Patients with incurable cancers enrolled in early phase clinical trials often face uncertainty about prognosis, yet advance care planning (ACP) is frequently delayed. The objective of this study was to assess the documentation of ACP discussions among patients enrolled in early phase oncology trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records for all adults enrolled in early phase clinical trials at a single Australian institution (2012–2021). Data included time from metastatic diagnosis to first ACP discussion, clinical and sociodemographic factors, triggers for discussion, and clinician specialty. Results: Among 170 patients (58% male; median age 65 years), ACP documentation was identified in 109 (64%). ACP was most often initiated within the final year of life (73.8%), with a median interval of 23.5 months from metastatic diagnosis to first documentation. Common triggers were disease progression (39.6%) and hospital admission (37.8%). Discussions were typically led by the treating oncologist or trials specialist (43%) and palliative care physician (37.8%). The most frequently documented topic was the limitations of invasive care such as intubation (60%). Conclusions: ACP documentation was present in two-thirds of patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials, typically late in the disease trajectory. Integrating structured, earlier ACP discussions into oncology pathways would improve alignment of care with patient goals and enhance end-of-life care.
AB - Background/Objectives: Patients with incurable cancers enrolled in early phase clinical trials often face uncertainty about prognosis, yet advance care planning (ACP) is frequently delayed. The objective of this study was to assess the documentation of ACP discussions among patients enrolled in early phase oncology trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records for all adults enrolled in early phase clinical trials at a single Australian institution (2012–2021). Data included time from metastatic diagnosis to first ACP discussion, clinical and sociodemographic factors, triggers for discussion, and clinician specialty. Results: Among 170 patients (58% male; median age 65 years), ACP documentation was identified in 109 (64%). ACP was most often initiated within the final year of life (73.8%), with a median interval of 23.5 months from metastatic diagnosis to first documentation. Common triggers were disease progression (39.6%) and hospital admission (37.8%). Discussions were typically led by the treating oncologist or trials specialist (43%) and palliative care physician (37.8%). The most frequently documented topic was the limitations of invasive care such as intubation (60%). Conclusions: ACP documentation was present in two-thirds of patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials, typically late in the disease trajectory. Integrating structured, earlier ACP discussions into oncology pathways would improve alignment of care with patient goals and enhance end-of-life care.
KW - advance care planning
KW - clinical trial
KW - documentation
KW - medical records
KW - neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105023081793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers17223655
DO - 10.3390/cancers17223655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105023081793
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 17
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 22
M1 - 3655
ER -