Does a painless death harm an invertebrate?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper explains a meaningful sense in which a painless death can be a misfortune for an invertebrate. The account presented is a logical implication of bringing together two distinct pieces of theory: the deprivation account of the harm of death and the biocentric ethical theory developed by the New Zealand philosopher, Nicholas Agar. Combined, the two theories support the following thesis: death harms an invertebrate because it deprives the individual of future biopreference satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-157
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Zoologist
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • animal welfare
  • death
  • ethics
  • invertebrates

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does a painless death harm an invertebrate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this