Does 'competition' kill 'social capital'?

Peri O'Shea, Rosemary Leonard, Michael Darcy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In the emerging environment created by National Competition Policy, and with significant devolution of human service provision, 'social capital' has come to be seen as an element of value in the non-government sector. However, concerns have also been raised about the impact of competitive tendering and purchase of service contracts on the ability of community organisations to participate in policy debates or advocate on behalf of client groups and to engage in broader community development, and on the likelihood of local grassroots participation in management. Through interviews with co-ordinators and management committee members in NSW, the present research identified seven specific areas of concern for local, community-based community-service organisations, and also strategies being developed to address them. Three broad types of strategies for building social capital under competition policy emerged: (i) Trying to work within constraints - an attitude of 'business as usual' but often resulting in a reduction in community development activities; (ii) Unforced partnerships - formation by community organisations of their own alliances; and (iii) Forging of a stronger community-sector identity - establishing distinguishing features that identify community organisations as parts of a recognisable whole.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages21
    JournalThird Sector Review
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • social capital (sociology)
    • National Competition Policy (Australia)
    • competition
    • non-governmental organizations
    • contracting out
    • human services

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does 'competition' kill 'social capital'?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this