Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does preprocedural ultrasound prior to lumbar neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia increase first-pass success in adults with obesity? A systematic review

  • Aaron K. Khoo
  • , Annie Huynh
  • , Anita Pelecanos
  • , Victoria A. Eley
    • Nepean Hospital
    • Blacktown Hospital
    • Queensland Institute of Medical Research
    • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    • University of Queensland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background and Aims: Preprocedural ultrasound (PPU) reduces the risk of technical failure in non-obese patients and when technical difficulty is predicted. We conducted this review to determine if PPU improves first-pass needle insertion success for neuraxial anesthesia in patients with obesity. Methods: We conducted a systematic review without meta-analysis, due to the small number of included studies. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022368271). We conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 1980 to October 1, 2022 for peer-reviewed randomized controlled or observational studies comparing PPU versus landmark techniques in patients with body mass index >30 kg/m2. The quality of evidence was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: There were nine randomized controlled studies, comprising 866 patients having lumbo-sacral neuraxial techniques. Three studies utilized a small handheld ultrasound device called Accuroâ„¢ and six utilized non-handheld ultrasound devices. Certainty of evidence was low for improving the first-pass success rate. There was evidence (moderate certainty) that PPU decreased number of passes, increased first insertion attempt success, and reduced number of insertion attempts. There was no evidence that PPU affected identifying time, needling time, or overall procedural time. There was no evidence that PPU influenced procedural failure rate (very low certainty evidence) and insufficient evidence to suggest that artificial intelligence-supported handheld devices were superior to conventional ultrasound devices. Conclusions: In patients with obesity, there is evidence of very-low to moderate certainty that PPU improves markers of insertion success, with no indication of increased adverse effects. PPU should be used to reduce attempts. Further studies adhering to standardized outcome definitions are required for definitive recommendations. Registration: The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022368271).
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere70039
    JournalHealth Science Reports
    Volume7
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2024 The Author(s). Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • body mass index
    • neuraxial
    • obesity
    • palpation
    • preprocedural
    • spinal
    • ultrasound

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does preprocedural ultrasound prior to lumbar neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia increase first-pass success in adults with obesity? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this