E-prescription : views and acceptance of general practitioners and pharmacists in Greater Sydney

Phyllis Lau, Minh Thuan Tran, Ricky Yong Kim, Alsayed Hashem Alrefae, Sangwoo Ryu, Jim Chyuan Teh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Electronic prescription (e-prescription) was introduced in 2020 in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aimed to explore general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists' experience with, and facilitators and barriers to, the use of e-prescription. Methods. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with GPs and pharmacists in Greater Sydney to explore their experience with e-prescription. Thematic analysis used descriptive and mixed inductive and deductive approaches. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to further interpret and organise the themes. Results. Eleven GPs and nine pharmacists were interviewed. Thirteen themes were elicited, seven of which were categorised as benefits (facilitators) and six were challenges (barriers). Four facilitator themes (convenience for healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients, addressing issues with paper prescriptions, contactless nature reducing access barriers during COVID-19 lockdown, and enabling patients to manage multiple prescriptions) were mapped to the TAM construct of 'perceived usefulness'; and one facilitator (an easier process) and two barrier themes (lack of information during implementation, and technological issues) were mapped to the TAM construct of 'perceived ease of use'. Themes that fell outside these constructs were separately categorised: four barrier themes (reluctance of some patients and HCPs to change, patient expectations of 'instant prescription' and lost opportunities for best-practice care, HCPs' perceptions of inadequate govern- mental governance, and ongoing costs) were 'other issues with e-prescription', and two facilitator themes (providing training on the use of e-prescription for HCPs and patients, and making e-prescription more streamlined) were 'suggestions to improve'. Conclusion. There are many facilitators and barriers to the use of e-prescription. Our findings may inform the future promotion of e-prescription post- COVID-19 pandemic. Further research should focus on consumers' perspectives of e-prescription.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberPY22240
Number of pages10
JournalAustralian Journal of Primary Health
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Keywords

  • healthcare providers
  • barriers
  • facilitators
  • perceptions
  • telehealth
  • general practitioners
  • technology acceptance model
  • community pharmacists

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'E-prescription : views and acceptance of general practitioners and pharmacists in Greater Sydney'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this