TY - JOUR
T1 - Eco-friendly hybrid concrete using pozzolanic binder and glass fibers
AU - Vali, K. Shaiksha
AU - Murugan, B. S.
AU - Reddy, S. K.
AU - Noroozinejad Farsangi, E.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Hybrid Concrete focused on development of buildings, highways, and other structures of civil engineering. In the current study, various mix combinations have been prepared and tested with different percentages of super-plasticizer at different levels of water reduction for obtaining the optimum mix. Further, study on different properties of hybrid concrete and replacement of ordinary portland cement (OPC) with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), silica fume (SF) and glass fibers (GF) for obtaining highly cement replaced concrete (HCRC) and glass fiber concrete (GFC). The concrete performance was evaluated based on slump cone test, compressive strength test, split tensile strength test, flexural strength test, water absorption test and ultrasonic pulse velocity test. It was observed from the results that, the best performance of HCRC achieved at 50% GGBFS and 3% silica fume replacement. Further, in the case of GFC, 0.2% of glass fibers showed high performance in terms of split tensile and flexural strength at all ages. The optimized concrete mixtures like HCRC and GFC performed better than the control concrete (CC).
AB - Hybrid Concrete focused on development of buildings, highways, and other structures of civil engineering. In the current study, various mix combinations have been prepared and tested with different percentages of super-plasticizer at different levels of water reduction for obtaining the optimum mix. Further, study on different properties of hybrid concrete and replacement of ordinary portland cement (OPC) with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), silica fume (SF) and glass fibers (GF) for obtaining highly cement replaced concrete (HCRC) and glass fiber concrete (GFC). The concrete performance was evaluated based on slump cone test, compressive strength test, split tensile strength test, flexural strength test, water absorption test and ultrasonic pulse velocity test. It was observed from the results that, the best performance of HCRC achieved at 50% GGBFS and 3% silica fume replacement. Further, in the case of GFC, 0.2% of glass fibers showed high performance in terms of split tensile and flexural strength at all ages. The optimized concrete mixtures like HCRC and GFC performed better than the control concrete (CC).
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:72456
U2 - 10.5829/ije.2020.33.07a.03
DO - 10.5829/ije.2020.33.07a.03
M3 - Article
SN - 1728-1431
VL - 33
SP - 1183
EP - 1191
JO - International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics
JF - International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics
IS - 7
ER -