Abstract
This case study describes the conflicts between the needs of a university animal ethics committee to meet legislative requirements and the pedagogical outcomes for third year undergraduate project students working with animals in an Australian context. The projects undertaken by this cohort are conducted in collaboration with a wide variety of external clients, using a diverse array of vertebrate species and involve many levels of 'invasiveness' or risk. Conflicts are discussed from the perspective of the various parties involved including the committee, academic staff in the role of supervisors, students and external clients. Ways forward are suggested to improve the process but it is clear that education of the committee, academic staff, students and clients is required and that it is essential to ensure open-channels for dialogue and discussion are utilised effectively.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 193-200 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Australian Zoologist |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |