TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of lower body compression garments on submaximal and maximal running performance in cold (10°C) and hot (32°C) environments
AU - Goh, Shi Shien
AU - Laursen, Paul B.
AU - Dascombe, Ben
AU - Nosaka, Kazunori
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - No previous studies have investigated the effect of lower body compression garments (CG) on running performance in the heat. This study tested the hypothesis that CG would negatively affect running performance in the heat by comparing CG and non-CG conditions for running performance and physiological responses in hot and cold conditions. Ten male recreational runners (29.0 ñ 10.0 years, V̇O2max: 58.7 ñ 2.7 ml kg -1 min-1) performed four treadmill tests consisting of 20-min running at first ventilatory threshold followed by a run to exhaustion at V̇O2max velocity in four conditions: 10ðC with CG, 10ðC without CG, 32ðC with CG, and 32ðC without CG (randomised, counterbalanced order). Time to exhaustion (TTE), skin and rectal temperature, V̇O2, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared between CG and non-CG conditions at each environmental temperature. TTE was not significantly different between the CG and non-CG conditions at 10ðC (158 ñ 74 vs. 148 ñ 73 s) and 32ðC (115 ñ 40 vs. 97 ñ 33 s); however, there was a small (0.15) and moderate effect size (0.48), respectively, suggestive of an improvement in TTE with CG. Lower limb skin temperature was 1.5ðC higher at 10ðC with CG (P < 0.05), but no significant differences in other physiological variables, including rectal temperature, were observed between garment conditions. Interestingly, RPE was lower (P < 0.05) during submaximal running at 32ðC with CG (13.8 ñ 2.0) compared with non-CG (14.5 ñ 2.7). It was concluded that CG had no adverse effects on running performance in hot conditions.
AB - No previous studies have investigated the effect of lower body compression garments (CG) on running performance in the heat. This study tested the hypothesis that CG would negatively affect running performance in the heat by comparing CG and non-CG conditions for running performance and physiological responses in hot and cold conditions. Ten male recreational runners (29.0 ñ 10.0 years, V̇O2max: 58.7 ñ 2.7 ml kg -1 min-1) performed four treadmill tests consisting of 20-min running at first ventilatory threshold followed by a run to exhaustion at V̇O2max velocity in four conditions: 10ðC with CG, 10ðC without CG, 32ðC with CG, and 32ðC without CG (randomised, counterbalanced order). Time to exhaustion (TTE), skin and rectal temperature, V̇O2, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared between CG and non-CG conditions at each environmental temperature. TTE was not significantly different between the CG and non-CG conditions at 10ðC (158 ñ 74 vs. 148 ñ 73 s) and 32ðC (115 ñ 40 vs. 97 ñ 33 s); however, there was a small (0.15) and moderate effect size (0.48), respectively, suggestive of an improvement in TTE with CG. Lower limb skin temperature was 1.5ðC higher at 10ðC with CG (P < 0.05), but no significant differences in other physiological variables, including rectal temperature, were observed between garment conditions. Interestingly, RPE was lower (P < 0.05) during submaximal running at 32ðC with CG (13.8 ñ 2.0) compared with non-CG (14.5 ñ 2.7). It was concluded that CG had no adverse effects on running performance in hot conditions.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:71661
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-010-1705-2
DO - 10.1007/s00421-010-1705-2
M3 - Article
SN - 1439-6327
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 111
SP - 819
EP - 826
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 5
ER -