Abstract
On 24 September 2021, The Lancet medical journal highlighted an article on its cover with a single sentence in large text; "Historically, the anatomy and physiology of bodies with vaginas have been neglected." This statement, in which the word "women" was replaced with the phrase "bodies with vaginas," is part of a trend to remove sexed terms such as "women" and "mothers" from discussions of female reproduction. The good and important intention behind these changes is sensitivity to, and acknowledgment of, the needs of people who are biologically female and yet do not consider themselves to be women because of their gender identity (1). However, these changes are often not deliberated regarding their impact on accuracy or potential for other unintended consequences. In this paper we present some background to this issue, describe various observed impacts, consider a number of potentially deleterious consequences, and suggest a way forward.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 818856 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Global Women's Health |
| Volume | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effective communication about pregnancy, birth, lactation, breastfeeding and newborn care : the importance of sexed language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver