Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of different types of low-intensity management on plant-pollinator interactions in Estonian grasslands

  • Elena Motivans Svara
  • , Valentin Stefan
  • , Esther Sossai
  • , Reinart Feldmann
  • , Dianne Joy Aguilon
  • , Anna Bontsutsnaja
  • , Anna E-Vojtko
  • , Isabel C. Kilian
  • , Piret Lang
  • , Marilin Motlep
  • , Elisabeth Prangel
  • , Mari-Liis Viljur
  • , Tiffany M. Knight
  • , Lena Neuenkamp
  • Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) , Germany
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • University of Szeged
  • University of the Philippines
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences
  • University of South Bohemia
  • Research Museum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity
  • University of Bonn
  • University of Tartu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the face of global pollinator decline, extensively managed grasslands play an important role in supporting stable pollinator communities. However, different types of extensive management may promote particular plant species and thus particular functional traits. As the functional traits of flowering plant species (e.g., flower size and shape) in a habitat help determine the identity and frequency of pollinator visitors, they can also influence the structures of plant−pollinator interaction networks (i.e., pollination networks). The aim of this study was to examine how the type of low-intensity traditional management influences plant and pollinator composition, the structure of plant−pollinator interactions, and their mediation by floral and insect functional traits. Specifically, we compared mown wooded meadows to grazed alvar pastures in western Estonia. We found that both management types fostered equal diversity of plants and pollinators, and overlapping, though still distinct, plant and pollinator compositions. Wooded meadow pollination networks had significantly higher connectance and specialization, while alvar pasture networks achieved higher interaction diversity at a standardized sampling of interactions. Pollinators with small body sizes and short proboscis lengths were more specialized in their preference for particular plant species and the specialization of individual pollinators was higher in alvar pastures than in wooded meadows. All in all, the two management types promoted diverse plant and pollinator communities, which enabled the development of equally even and nested pollination networks. The same generalist plant and pollinator species were important for the pollination networks of both wooded meadows and alvar pastures; however, they were complemented by management-specific species, which accounted for differences in network structure. Therefore, the implementation of both management types in the same landscape helps to maintain high species and interaction diversity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16909-16926
Number of pages18
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume11
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • conservation
  • land use
  • plant−pollinator networks
  • seminatural grasslands

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of different types of low-intensity management on plant-pollinator interactions in Estonian grasslands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this