Effects of the CCR5-Δ32 mutation on hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses in patients with haemophilia

Golo Ahlenstiel, Rainer P. Woitas, Agathe Iwan, Jacob Nattermann, Georg Feldmann, Jurgen K. Rockstroh, Johannes Oldenburg, Bernd Kupfer, Tilman Sauerbruch, Ulrich Spengler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antiviral T cells express the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5). Their recruitment to the liver is an important step in the immune response. A 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene leads to reduced expression and total loss of CCR5 in CCR5-Δ32 heterozygous and homozygous subjects, respectively. However, the role of this mutation for antiviral immunity remains unclear. Here, we analysed proliferation, IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion (ELISpot) induced by the HCV antigens core, NS3, NS4, and NS5a in 21 anti-HCV-positive haemophiliac patients in relationship to their CCR5 genotypes (CCR5 wildtype n = 10, CCR5-Δ32 heterozygous n = 5 and CCR5-Δ32 homozygous n = 6). Furthermore, T cell migration in response to the CCR5 ligands CCL3, -4 and -5 was studied. Overall IFN-γ responses to HCV proteins were only slightly greater in CCR5 wild-type patients than in CCR5-Δ32 carriers (0.6 versus 0.24 SFC/104 PBMC; p = 0.043). This difference was consistently seen with all tested HCV antigens. In contrast, neither T cell migration, nor PBMC proliferation, nor IL-4 production differed between CCR5 genotypes. Interruption of the CCR5 signalling pathway due to CCR5-Δ32 may potentially result in subtle reduction of HCV specific IFN-γ responses in anti-HCV-positive haemophiliac patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalImmunological Investigations
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Keywords

  • hemophilia
  • hepatitis C virus
  • immune response

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of the CCR5-Δ32 mutation on hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses in patients with haemophilia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this