Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Weekly Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Protocols in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: An Australian Real-World, Multicenter Study

  • Samantha Kurniawan
  • , Angela Hwang
  • , Nicole Wong Doo
  • , Tracy King
  • , Christian Bryant
  • , Jennifer Zhang
  • , Kristina Whelan
  • , Parisa Fani-Molky
  • , Giselle Kidson-Gerber
  • , Annmarie Bosco
  • , Nada Hamad
  • , Gurdeep Parmar
  • , Fiona Kwok
  • , Sam Lai
  • , Silvia Ling
  • , P. Joy Ho
  • , Georgia McCaughan
  • , Adam Bryant
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • University of New South Wales
  • St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
  • South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service
  • Westmead Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) remains a standard of care regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in centers without access to upfront anti-CD38 therapy within the Asia-Pacific. However, regimens proven efficacious in clinical trials utilize twice-weekly bortezomib, which is now thought to confer unacceptable toxicity, particularly in transplant-ineligible patients. There is a paucity of prospective data on RVD treatment schedules utilizing weekly bortezomib, which has implications for health care systems implementing standardized treatment based on clinical trial evidence. Methods: Eighty-three patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma from six hospitals in Australia, received one of two RVD regimens utilizing weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (Modified SWOG and Modified RVD Lite) pragmatically adapted from their corresponding clinical trials. Baseline characteristics, response rates, toxicities, and survival were assessed. Results: At a median follow-up of 27.4 months, Modified SWOG achieved an ORR 91.4%, ≥ VGPR 71.4%, and 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) of 63.1% (95% CI: 47.6–83.5). Modified RVD Lite achieved an ORR 93.9%, ≥ VGPR 64.7%, and 24-month PFS of 53.6% (95% CI: 39.1–73.4). Despite dose attenuation, significant toxicity was still seen overall with hospitalizations in 48.2% and premature cessation due to toxicity in 31.3%. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was lower than in published clinical trials, reported in 32 (38.6%) patients, with Grade 3 events in only 2 patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that real-world outcomes of weekly RVD regimens have comparable efficacy to published twice-weekly regimens; however, toxicity remains a significant challenge in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords

  • frailty
  • myeloma
  • RVD
  • transplant-ineligible
  • VRD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Tolerability of Weekly Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Protocols in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: An Australian Real-World, Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this