TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds : systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials
AU - Woo, Kevin
AU - Dowsett, Caroline
AU - Costa, Ben
AU - Ebohon, Stephen
AU - Woodmansey, Emma J.
AU - Malone, Matthew
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects (I2 < 50%) or random-effects model (I2 ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta-analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm2, 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P =.0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P <.0001). This meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols.
AB - The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects (I2 < 50%) or random-effects model (I2 ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta-analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm2, 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P =.0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P <.0001). This meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:60631
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.13560
DO - 10.1111/iwj.13560
M3 - Article
SN - 1742-4801
VL - 18
SP - 586
EP - 597
JO - International Wound Journal
JF - International Wound Journal
IS - 5
ER -