Abstract
This article reassesses how members of the UN Security Council exercise influence over the Council's decision-making process, with particular focus on the ten elected members (the E10). A common understanding of Security Council dynamics accords predominance to the five permanent members (the P5), suggesting bleak prospects for the Council as a forum that promotes the voices and representation of the 188 non-permanent members. The assumption is that real power rests with the P5, while the E10 are there to make up the numbers. By articulating a richer account of Council dynamics, this article contests the conventional wisdom that P5 centrality crowds out space for the E10 to influence Council decision-making. It also shows that opportunities for influencing Council decision-making go beyond stints of elected membership. It argues that the assumed centrality of the P5 on the Council thus needs to be qualified and re-evaluated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-115 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Leiden Journal of International Law |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law.
Keywords
- decsion-making
- elected members' influence
- reform
- UN Security Council