TY - JOUR
T1 - Employer self-insurance decisions and the implications of the patient protection and Affordable Care Act as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (ACA)
AU - Eibner, Christine
AU - Girosi, Federico
AU - Miller, Amalia
AU - Cordova, Amado
AU - McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
AU - Pace, Nicholas M.
AU - Price, Carter C.
AU - Vardavas, Raffaele
AU - Gresenz, Carole Roan
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (ACA) changes the regulatory environment within which health insurance policies on the small-group market are bought and sold. New regulations include rate bands that limit premium price variation, risk-adjustment policies that will transfer funds from low-actuarial-risk to high-actuarial-risk plans, and requirements that plans include “essential health benefits.” While the new regulations will be applied to all non-grandfathered fully insured policies purchased by businesses with 100 or fewer workers, self-insured plans are exempt from these regulations. As a result, some firms may have a stronger incentive to offer self-insured plans after the ACA takes full effect. In this article we identify factors that influence employers’ decisions to self-insure and estimate how the ACA will influence self-insurance rates. We also consider the implications of higher self-insurance rates for adverse selection in the non-self-insured small-group market and whether enrollees in self-insured plans receive different benefits than enrollees in fully-insured plans. Results are based on data analysis, literature review, findings from discussions with stakeholders, and microsimulation analysis using the COMPARE model. Overall, we find little evidence that self-insured plans differ systematically from fully insured plans in terms of benefit generosity, price, or claims denial rates. Stakeholders expressed significant concern about adverse selection in the health insurance exchanges due to regulatory exemptions for self-insured plans. However, our microsimulation analysis predicts a sizable increase in self-insurance only if comprehensive stop-loss policies become widely available after the ACA takes full effect and the expected cost of self-insuring with stop-loss is comparable to the cost of being fully insured in a market without rating regulations. This article is a shorter version of a technical report published by Rand Corporation in 2011 (https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR971.html)
AB - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (ACA) changes the regulatory environment within which health insurance policies on the small-group market are bought and sold. New regulations include rate bands that limit premium price variation, risk-adjustment policies that will transfer funds from low-actuarial-risk to high-actuarial-risk plans, and requirements that plans include “essential health benefits.” While the new regulations will be applied to all non-grandfathered fully insured policies purchased by businesses with 100 or fewer workers, self-insured plans are exempt from these regulations. As a result, some firms may have a stronger incentive to offer self-insured plans after the ACA takes full effect. In this article we identify factors that influence employers’ decisions to self-insure and estimate how the ACA will influence self-insurance rates. We also consider the implications of higher self-insurance rates for adverse selection in the non-self-insured small-group market and whether enrollees in self-insured plans receive different benefits than enrollees in fully-insured plans. Results are based on data analysis, literature review, findings from discussions with stakeholders, and microsimulation analysis using the COMPARE model. Overall, we find little evidence that self-insured plans differ systematically from fully insured plans in terms of benefit generosity, price, or claims denial rates. Stakeholders expressed significant concern about adverse selection in the health insurance exchanges due to regulatory exemptions for self-insured plans. However, our microsimulation analysis predicts a sizable increase in self-insurance only if comprehensive stop-loss policies become widely available after the ACA takes full effect and the expected cost of self-insuring with stop-loss is comparable to the cost of being fully insured in a market without rating regulations. This article is a shorter version of a technical report published by Rand Corporation in 2011 (https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR971.html)
KW - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (United States)
KW - Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (United States)
KW - self, insurance
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:41285
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945181/
M3 - Article
SN - 2162-8254
VL - 1
JO - Rand Health Quarterly
JF - Rand Health Quarterly
IS - 2
M1 - 7
ER -