TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishment of a risk prediction model for residual back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
AU - Rong, Yi
AU - Zhu, Yihua
AU - Yin, Heng
AU - Yu, Hao
AU - Wang, Jianwei
AU - Shao, Yang
AU - Li, Shaoshuo
AU - Ye, Jiapeng
AU - Guo, Yang
AU - Ma, Yong
AU - Wang, Lining
AU - Hua, Zhen
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Purpose: Severe residual back pain (RBP) after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) significantly impacts postoperative prognosis and quality of life in patients. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for RBP in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients after PKP, to establish a risk prediction model, and to validate its effectiveness. Methods: A case-control study was carried out among OVCF patients, who were assigned to either the training set (these patients were recruited from January 2018 and June 2020) or the validation set (these patients were recruited from July 2020 and December 2020). Risk factors were identified by univariate analysis and multifactor logistic regression analysis. The performance of the prediction model was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to assess discrimination. A nomogram for risk prediction was constructed, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves were used to assess calibration, and decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical use of the model. Results: A total of 647 patients were included, 569 cases were used to train the model and 78 cases were used for external validation. Based on the data of model training set, age, bone mineral density, trauma history, posterior fascial edema, platelet distribution width, serum chloride, and middle vertebral height were independent risk factors for RBP after PKP (P ≤ 0.05). The AUC of the risk prediction model constructed thus was 0.788 (95% CI, 0.740–0.836), cut off (0.710, 0.761), with good discrimination. Calibration curves of the model training and validation sets were between the standard curve and the acceptable line, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model training and validation sets were χ2 = 6.354 and χ2 = 7.240, (P = 0.608 and 0.511), respectively, which have good calibration. The decision curve analysis showed that the threshold probability interval of the net benefit value of the model was 6.3%–82.3% for the training set, 8.7%–55.6% and 72.5%–81.3% for the validation set. Conclusion: The constructed model showed good predictive ability in the occurrence of residual back pain after PKP, which can provide a scientific basis and guidance for clinical prevention and treatment.
AB - Purpose: Severe residual back pain (RBP) after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) significantly impacts postoperative prognosis and quality of life in patients. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for RBP in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients after PKP, to establish a risk prediction model, and to validate its effectiveness. Methods: A case-control study was carried out among OVCF patients, who were assigned to either the training set (these patients were recruited from January 2018 and June 2020) or the validation set (these patients were recruited from July 2020 and December 2020). Risk factors were identified by univariate analysis and multifactor logistic regression analysis. The performance of the prediction model was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to assess discrimination. A nomogram for risk prediction was constructed, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves were used to assess calibration, and decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical use of the model. Results: A total of 647 patients were included, 569 cases were used to train the model and 78 cases were used for external validation. Based on the data of model training set, age, bone mineral density, trauma history, posterior fascial edema, platelet distribution width, serum chloride, and middle vertebral height were independent risk factors for RBP after PKP (P ≤ 0.05). The AUC of the risk prediction model constructed thus was 0.788 (95% CI, 0.740–0.836), cut off (0.710, 0.761), with good discrimination. Calibration curves of the model training and validation sets were between the standard curve and the acceptable line, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model training and validation sets were χ2 = 6.354 and χ2 = 7.240, (P = 0.608 and 0.511), respectively, which have good calibration. The decision curve analysis showed that the threshold probability interval of the net benefit value of the model was 6.3%–82.3% for the training set, 8.7%–55.6% and 72.5%–81.3% for the validation set. Conclusion: The constructed model showed good predictive ability in the occurrence of residual back pain after PKP, which can provide a scientific basis and guidance for clinical prevention and treatment.
KW - osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
KW - percutaneous kyphoplasty
KW - regression analysis
KW - residual back pain
KW - risk prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105014251670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625518
DO - 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625518
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105014251670
SN - 2296-875X
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Surgery
JF - Frontiers in Surgery
M1 - 1625518
ER -