Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating recalibrating AI models for breast cancer diagnosis in a new context : insights from transfer learning, image enhancement and high-quality training data integration

  • Z. Jiang
  • , Z. Gandomkar
  • , P. D. (Yun) Trieu
  • , Taba Seyedamir Tavakoli
  • , M. L. Barron
  • , P. Obeidy
  • , Sarah J. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the adaptability of four state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) models to the Australian mammographic context through transfer learning, explores the impact of image enhancement on model performance and analyses the relationship between AI outputs and histopathological features for clinical relevance and accuracy assessment. A total of 1712 screening mammograms (n = 856 cancer cases and n = 856 matched normal cases) were used in this study. The 856 cases with cancer lesions were annotated by two expert radiologists and the level of concordance between their annotations was used to establish two sets: a ‘high-concordances subset’ with 99% agreement of cancer location and an ‘entire dataset’ with all cases included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of Globally aware Multiple Instance Classifier (GMIC), Global-Local Activation Maps (GLAM), I&H and End2End AI models, both in the pretrained and transfer learning modes, with and without applying the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) algorithm. The four AI models with and without transfer learning in the high-concordance subset outperformed those in the entire dataset. Applying the CLAHE algorithm to mammograms improved the performance of the AI models. In the high-concordance subset with the transfer learning and CLAHE algorithm applied, the AUC of the GMIC model was highest (0.912), followed by the GLAM model (0.909), I&H (0.893) and End2End (0.875). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the performances of the four AI models between the high-concordance subset and the entire dataset. The AI models demonstrated significant differences in malignancy probability concerning different tumour size categories in mammograms. The performance of AI models was affected by several factors such as concordance classification, image enhancement and transfer learning. Mammograms with a strong concordance with radiologists’ annotations, applying image enhancement and transfer learning could enhance the accuracy of AI models.

Original languageEnglish
Article number322
Number of pages16
JournalCancers
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • deep learning
  • transfer learning
  • image enhancement
  • mammography
  • radiologists’ concordance
  • saliency maps
  • artificial intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating recalibrating AI models for breast cancer diagnosis in a new context : insights from transfer learning, image enhancement and high-quality training data integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this