Evaluating the impact of Australia's federal human rights scrutiny regime

Daniel Reynolds, George Williams

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

Abstract

For the past seven years, Australia has operated a national regime to protect human rights by way of enhanced parliamentary scrutiny. Under this model, all proposed federal laws must be accompanied by a statement of compatibility (SOC) setting out whether the law would be compatible with many of Australia's most significant international human rights obligations. The proposed law and its accompanying statement are then subjected to review by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (PJCHR). The PJCHR makes a determination of the extent to which the proposed law is compatible with human rights and reports its findings to Parliament.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw Making and Human Rights
Subtitle of host publicationExecutive and Parliamentary Scrutiny Across Australian Jurisdictions
EditorsJulie Debeljak, Laura Grenfell
Place of PublicationPyrmont, N.S.W.
PublisherThomson Reuters
Chapter3
Pages67-98
Number of pages32
ISBN (Print)9780455242835
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the impact of Australia's federal human rights scrutiny regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this