Evaluation of alternate image capturing devices for recording fingermarks at crime scenes

Zac Grima, Brenden Riley, Val Spikmans, Chris Lennard, Robert Ebeyan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This project evaluated the fingermark imaging ability of several alternate image capturing devices selected for their potential to assist with the recording of fingermarks in difficult-to-reach locations commonly encountered at crime scenes, e.g. the inside surface of door handles. Four small form-factor non-DSLR camera systems — intraoral camera, borescope, fibre-optic camera and an iPhone — were evaluated under controlled conditions for their ability to image fingermarks with sufficient detail for identification. Evaluation was conducted using black powdered fingermarks and standard photographic test targets. A qualitative visual evaluation approach was also developed to gauge whether image quality was appropriate for fingermark identification. The results obtained indicated that most of the systems were capable of capturing fingermark details suitable for identification in controlled environments; however, the inherent contrast of the fingermark had an impact on the success of various imaging devices. The practicality and capability of alternate camera devices for fingermark recovery in pseudo-operational conditions is part of ongoing research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-80
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume56
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of alternate image capturing devices for recording fingermarks at crime scenes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this