Explanations for nitrogen decline : response

Rachel E. Mason; Joseph M. Craine; Nina K. Lany; Mathieu Jonard; Scott V. Ollinger; Peter M. Groffman; Robinson W. Fulweiler; Jay Angerer; Quentin D. Read; Peter B. Reich; Pamela H. Templer; Andrew J. Elmore

doi:10.1126/science.abq8690

Explanations for nitrogen decline : response

Rachel E. Mason, Joseph M. Craine, Nina K. Lany, Mathieu Jonard, Scott V. Ollinger, Peter M. Groffman, Robinson W. Fulweiler, Jay Angerer, Quentin D. Read, Peter B. Reich, Pamela H. Templer, Andrew J. Elmore

Western Sydney University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Olff et al. select only a subset of the evidence for declining nitrogen availability and assign unlikely mechanisms to reach the conclusion that nitrogen availability is not declining over large areas of Earth. We disagree that the evidence can be grouped into the categories that Olff et al. describe; the complete set of observations is wider in scope and cannot be explained by the mechanisms that the authors propose.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1170-1170
Number of pages	1
Journal	Science
Volume	376
Issue number	6598
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq8690
Publication status	Published - 2022

Access to Document

10.1126/science.abq8690

Cite this

@article{e6de1102d6e64f26810a82c1c53f7445,

title = "Explanations for nitrogen decline : response",

abstract = "Olff et al. select only a subset of the evidence for declining nitrogen availability and assign unlikely mechanisms to reach the conclusion that nitrogen availability is not declining over large areas of Earth. We disagree that the evidence can be grouped into the categories that Olff et al. describe; the complete set of observations is wider in scope and cannot be explained by the mechanisms that the authors propose.",

author = "Mason, {Rachel E.} and Craine, {Joseph M.} and Lany, {Nina K.} and Mathieu Jonard and Ollinger, {Scott V.} and Groffman, {Peter M.} and Fulweiler, {Robinson W.} and Jay Angerer and Read, {Quentin D.} and Reich, {Peter B.} and Templer, {Pamela H.} and Elmore, {Andrew J.}",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1126/science.abq8690",

language = "English",

volume = "376",

pages = "1170--1170",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6598",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explanations for nitrogen decline : response

AU - Mason, Rachel E.

AU - Craine, Joseph M.

AU - Lany, Nina K.

AU - Jonard, Mathieu

AU - Ollinger, Scott V.

AU - Groffman, Peter M.

AU - Fulweiler, Robinson W.

AU - Angerer, Jay

AU - Read, Quentin D.

AU - Reich, Peter B.

AU - Templer, Pamela H.

AU - Elmore, Andrew J.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Olff et al. select only a subset of the evidence for declining nitrogen availability and assign unlikely mechanisms to reach the conclusion that nitrogen availability is not declining over large areas of Earth. We disagree that the evidence can be grouped into the categories that Olff et al. describe; the complete set of observations is wider in scope and cannot be explained by the mechanisms that the authors propose.

AB - Olff et al. select only a subset of the evidence for declining nitrogen availability and assign unlikely mechanisms to reach the conclusion that nitrogen availability is not declining over large areas of Earth. We disagree that the evidence can be grouped into the categories that Olff et al. describe; the complete set of observations is wider in scope and cannot be explained by the mechanisms that the authors propose.

UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:70488

U2 - 10.1126/science.abq8690

DO - 10.1126/science.abq8690

M3 - Article

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 376

SP - 1170

EP - 1170

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6598

ER -

Explanations for nitrogen decline : response

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this