Exploring continuum and categorical conceptualisations of mental health and mental illness on Australian Websites: a systematic review and content analysis

  • Dominic K. Fernandez
  • , Saniya Singh
  • , Frank P. Deane
  • , Stewart A. Vella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is important to explore the types of conceptualisations and causes presented in online mental health promotion given the implications that these presentations may have on mental health stigma. This study systematically reviewed 92 Australian webpages focused on either mental health, mental illness, depression, or schizophrenia, to explore the types of conceptualisations and aetiologies presented. A minority of mental health and mental illness webpages (n = 8, 8.70%) explicitly presented continuum conceptualisations, with none providing explicit categorical conceptualisations. No depression or schizophrenia webpages presented explicit conceptualisations of any kind. All four webpage foci had a greater proportion of continuum than categorical conceptualisations. Moreover, both depression and schizophrenia webpages presented many mixed conceptualisations which included both continuum and categorical messaging. Most webpages mentioned biological and social causes equally across webpage foci. These findings suggest that Australian mental health websites predominantly present continuum conceptualisations of mental health and mental illness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-289
Number of pages15
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Categorical conceptualisation
  • Cause; systematic review
  • Continuum conceptualisation
  • Mental health
  • Mental illness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring continuum and categorical conceptualisations of mental health and mental illness on Australian Websites: a systematic review and content analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this