Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions : an application of the general model of academic choice

Geoffrey R. Barnes, Dennis M. McInerney, Herbert W. Marsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    34 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In many countries there remain substantial sex differences in enrolments in elective science courses, despite concerted efforts in recent years to alleviate them. This paper explores the reasons for these differences by comparing models of male and female enrolment intentions in elective courses in biology, chemistry and physics. The models are based on responses from approximately 450 students from 5 Australian high schools. First, a theoretical model, the Science Enrolment Model, was derived from Eccles and colleagues’ General Model of Academic Choice. Students’ responses were then used to develop empirical models of enrolment intentions in the three elective courses. Analyses for the models were conducted using the LISREL ‘mean structures’ extension. Sex differences in the dependent variables in the models were then attributed to the relevant sets of independent variables. Substantial sex differences were identified in measures of perceived career value, interest and performance expectations in all three models which explained between 70% and 82% of the sex differences in enrolment intentions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages23
    JournalThe Australian Educational Researcher
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • Educational psychology
    • Science
    • Sex differences
    • Study and teaching

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions : an application of the general model of academic choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this