Exploring the dimensional structure of bullying victimization among primary and lower-secondary school students : is one factor enough, or do we need more?

Davide Marengo, Michele Settanni, Laura Elvira Prino, Roberto H. Parada, Claudio Longobardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In adolescence, bullying victimization is typically represented in terms of a three-fold factor structure reflecting three components of verbal, physical, and social victimization. Recent studies have suggested the usefulness of alternativte models including both general and component-specific factors. In this study, we assessed the empirical and theoretical validity of an instrument assessing verbal, physical and social victimization using a set of alternative models of victimization: a unidimensional model, a three-factor model, and a bifactor model. Association between emerging factors and student variables were explored to establish theoretical fit of the models. Sample consisted of upper primary and lower secondary school students [N = 1311; 53% Male; Mean age (SD) = 10.73 (1.45)] and their teachers. The three factor and bifactor models showed good fit. In spite of acceptable fit, the unidimensional model showed lower empirical support when compared with the other models. The dimensions of the three-factor model showed similar associations with most student variables, while the bifactor showed more heterogeneous, and theoretically coherent associations. General victimization decreased with age and was positively related with externalizing and internalizing symptoms, student–teacher conflict and negative expectations. Verbal victimization showed increased prevalence among girls and older students. Physical victimization showed increased prevalence among boys and younger students, and positive associations with externalizing symptoms and student–teacher conflict. Social victimization was more frequent among girls, and positively related with internalizing symptoms and negative expectations toward teachers. These findings highlight the usefulness of modeling victimization using both general and form-specific dimensions for both assessment and theory-building purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number770
Number of pages11
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2019 Marengo, Settanni, Prino, Parada and Longobardi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Keywords

  • bullying in schools
  • factor analysis
  • statistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the dimensional structure of bullying victimization among primary and lower-secondary school students : is one factor enough, or do we need more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this