TY - GEN
T1 - Exploring the effective dimensions of engaging students in contemporary architecture design studios in times of change
AU - Iftikhar, Naima
AU - Crowther, Philip
AU - Burton, Lindy Osborne
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - ![CDATA[The architecture design studio is the pedagogical platform for the majority of learning and teaching experiences that take place within architecture design education. The traditional architecture design studio pedagogical model, signified as ‘signature pedagogy’, has gradually shifted away from its conventional forms of engaging students. Since the turn of the millennium, the studio has transformed into a contemporary form of design learning and teaching space based on several factors such as reduced contact time between academics and students, changes in studio spatial typology and a change in the hierarchy of academics that are involved in student engagement. These shifts have had a major impact on the ways in which students and teachers conduct dialogic interactions with one another and perceive their learning and teaching experiences. A qualitative case study at an Australian University undergraduate school of design seeks to explore and link the components of the interaction between the different stakeholders of contemporary architecture design studio pedagogy. The research seeks to verify and extend Laurillard’s conversational learning and teaching framework, to elaborate the theory and practice around contemporary design studio pedagogy. The components of the dialogic interaction between the different stakeholders form the basis for academics and students to reflect on their learning and teaching interaction informed by theoretical know-how and awareness rather than solely relying on intuition. The unpacking and understanding of these interactive components can inform design academics to adapt effective ways of engaging their students in architecture design studios.]]
AB - ![CDATA[The architecture design studio is the pedagogical platform for the majority of learning and teaching experiences that take place within architecture design education. The traditional architecture design studio pedagogical model, signified as ‘signature pedagogy’, has gradually shifted away from its conventional forms of engaging students. Since the turn of the millennium, the studio has transformed into a contemporary form of design learning and teaching space based on several factors such as reduced contact time between academics and students, changes in studio spatial typology and a change in the hierarchy of academics that are involved in student engagement. These shifts have had a major impact on the ways in which students and teachers conduct dialogic interactions with one another and perceive their learning and teaching experiences. A qualitative case study at an Australian University undergraduate school of design seeks to explore and link the components of the interaction between the different stakeholders of contemporary architecture design studio pedagogy. The research seeks to verify and extend Laurillard’s conversational learning and teaching framework, to elaborate the theory and practice around contemporary design studio pedagogy. The components of the dialogic interaction between the different stakeholders form the basis for academics and students to reflect on their learning and teaching interaction informed by theoretical know-how and awareness rather than solely relying on intuition. The unpacking and understanding of these interactive components can inform design academics to adapt effective ways of engaging their students in architecture design studios.]]
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:71389
M3 - Conference Paper
SP - 813
EP - 833
BT - The Asian Conference on Education 2018 (ACE2018): Official Conference Proceedings, Surviving & Thriving: Education in Times of Change, Toshi Center Hotel, Tokyo, Japan, October 13-15, 2018
PB - International Academic Forum
T2 - Asian Conference on Education
Y2 - 13 October 2018
ER -