Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors affecting blood alcohol concentration (BAC) estimation and drinking intention during voluntary breath testing (VBT) : a cross-sectional study

  • Naomi Pathirana
  • , David Medveczky
  • , Wendy Deng
  • , Sophie Abel
  • , Avigdor Zask
  • , Margaret Rolfe
  • , Philip Preston
  • , Sabrina Pit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the accuracy and factors influencing blood alcohol concentration self-estimation during voluntary breath testing. It also aimed to assess whether intended drinking behaviour changed after reviewing blood alcohol concentration and factors influencing this. A total of 462 Australian music festival patrons aged 18–40 years completed a survey exploring factors likely to affect estimation accuracy and provided an estimation of their blood alcohol concentration. A breathalyser reading was taken and participants were asked whether reviewing this reading changed their drinking intentions. Most respondents (58.4%) were accurate within 0.02% range, while 11.4% underestimated and 29.1% overestimated. Machine-read blood alcohol concentration was the most significant estimation accuracy predictor. Reviewing their readings changed the intention to drink in one-third of participants, indicating that voluntary breath testing may influence future drinking behaviour. Underestimation was associated with intention to drink less, whilst completing the survey earlier and <1 h since last drink was associated with intention to drink more.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)519-527
Number of pages9
JournalDrugs
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors affecting blood alcohol concentration (BAC) estimation and drinking intention during voluntary breath testing (VBT) : a cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this