Factors controlling the effectiveness of rechlor(am)ination to recover chloramine from nitrification

The two most commonly adopted strategies, rechlorination (addition of chlorine) and rechloramination (addition of chlorine and ammonia), to recover and stabilise chloramine from nitrification were comprehensively evaluated in laboratory- and full-scale systems. Laboratory-scale batch experiments were conducted in a nitrifying sample (~0.05 mg-N/L). In the full-scale service reservoir, repeated rechlorination was ineffective in suppressing nitrification and microbial chloramine decay during warmer months (>20 °C), even when rechlorination was started at nitrite <0.005 mg-N/L. Measurement of decay rates through microbial chloramine decay factor method provides a deeper understanding of a water sample than traditional nitrification indicators. The method has the ability to provide an early warning (one month in advance), show the presence of microbial chloramine decay in non-nitrified water and that of chloramine decaying proteins in any samples. In the batch sample, nitrification and the production of chloramine-decaying proteins and bacterial regrowth had to be suppressed to recover chloramine. Rechloramination (~2.5 mg/L) outperformed rechlorination, as it maintained a relatively higher chloramine concentration. Microbes were killed within 30 min of dosing chlor(am)ine, likely due to shock or compounds formed during chloramine formation reactions; however, microbes regrew (or survive) to a different degree in all samples despite the prolonged presence of chloramine (large CxT), defying the CxT concept. The key to the recovery of chloramine appears to be consistently maintaining chloramine >1.7 mg/L and shocking with a high chloramine dose. The findings will assist water utilities in designing and assessing the effectiveness of nitrification remediation strategies in chloraminated water supply systems.