Field, material, technique : on renewing postcolonial literary criticism

Ben Etherington, Jarad Zimbler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Concerned by the eclipse of concerted discussion of literary technique in the postcolonial field, this article outlines a critical practice which would restore questions of technique to the centre ground. Proceeding from the assumption that technique is the agent of art’s thinking, it proposes that the literary craft practised in any given work or authorship needs to be thought through in its context of intelligibility: a conception which synthesizes insights of Pierre Bourdieu and Theodor Adorno; particularly their respective notions of field and material. Then, in two short studies, on the critical reception of Louise Bennett in the Caribbean and J. M. Coetzee in South Africa, these concepts are put into motion to illuminate the truth-content of field-defining developments of the literary material.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)279-297
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Commonwealth Literature
    Volume49
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Field, material, technique : on renewing postcolonial literary criticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this