TY - JOUR
T1 - Field, material, technique : on renewing postcolonial literary criticism
AU - Etherington, Ben
AU - Zimbler, Jarad
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Concerned by the eclipse of concerted discussion of literary technique in the postcolonial field, this article outlines a critical practice which would restore questions of technique to the centre ground. Proceeding from the assumption that technique is the agent of art’s thinking, it proposes that the literary craft practised in any given work or authorship needs to be thought through in its context of intelligibility: a conception which synthesizes insights of Pierre Bourdieu and Theodor Adorno; particularly their respective notions of field and material. Then, in two short studies, on the critical reception of Louise Bennett in the Caribbean and J. M. Coetzee in South Africa, these concepts are put into motion to illuminate the truth-content of field-defining developments of the literary material.
AB - Concerned by the eclipse of concerted discussion of literary technique in the postcolonial field, this article outlines a critical practice which would restore questions of technique to the centre ground. Proceeding from the assumption that technique is the agent of art’s thinking, it proposes that the literary craft practised in any given work or authorship needs to be thought through in its context of intelligibility: a conception which synthesizes insights of Pierre Bourdieu and Theodor Adorno; particularly their respective notions of field and material. Then, in two short studies, on the critical reception of Louise Bennett in the Caribbean and J. M. Coetzee in South Africa, these concepts are put into motion to illuminate the truth-content of field-defining developments of the literary material.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/550320
U2 - 10.1177/0021989414538435
DO - 10.1177/0021989414538435
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9894
VL - 49
SP - 279
EP - 297
JO - Journal of Commonwealth Literature
JF - Journal of Commonwealth Literature
IS - 3
ER -