Abstract
There is merit in the proposition that ressentiment is not necessarily something to be overcome. As a feeling that grows in the face of social inequality, ressentiment can provide scope for positive social transformation. However, contemporary political developments complicate this optimistic assessment. We confront a historical moment in which ressentiment and progressive social change operate in tension rather than alignment. The ressentiment of economically and socially marginalized populations—those rendered “surplus” by neoliberal restructuring—increasingly fuels reactionary rather than emancipatory political formations. The resurgence of nativism as a legitimate response to contemporary problems in various countries is just one register of contemporary ressentiment, instantiated also in political discourses of progressive patriotism and left nationalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-8 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Conflict, Justice, Decolonization: Asia in Transition in the 21st Century |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- borders
- geopolitics
- geoeconomics
- digital culture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Firewalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver