Fit for purpose? : the suitability of oral health outcome measures to inform policy

T. M. Nguyen, H. Rogers, G. D. Taylor, U. Tonmukayakul, C. Lin, M. Hall, H. Calache, C. Vernazza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measuring outcomes for oral health is frequently undertaken using the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index. DMFT measures dental caries experience. As a condition-specific outcome, it is not relatable to consumers, nor does it capture the impact of dental caries on quality of life or outcomes that matter most to consumers. Efficient resource allocation should include patient values. It is crucial to use measurement instruments that record consumer values or preferences for oral health and oral diseases. These measures are often called patient-reported outcome measures and/or patient-reported experience measures. Outcome measures relevant to patients are recommended to influence and inform policy decision-making for oral health. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Oral health research and program evaluation should consider alternative outcome measures for population oral health other than the DMFT index.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-192
Number of pages3
JournalJDR Clinical and Translational Research
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© International Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research and American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research 2023.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fit for purpose? : the suitability of oral health outcome measures to inform policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this