Abstract
The recent emergence of text-to-image generative artificial intelligence (AI) diffusion models such as DALL-E, Firefly, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney has been touted with popular hype about the transformative potential in health care. This hype-driven, rapid assimilation comes with few professional guidelines and without regulatory oversight. Despite documented limitations, text-to-image generative AI creations have permeated nuclear medicine and medical imaging. Given the representation of medical imaging professions and potential dangers in misrepresentation and errors from both a reputation and community harm perspective, critical quality assurance of text-to-image generative AI creations is required. Here, tools for evaluating the quality and fitness for purpose of generative AI images in nuclear medicine and imaging are discussed. Generative AI text-to-image creation suffers quality limitations that are generally prohibitive of mainstream use in nuclear medicine and medical imaging. Text-to-image generative AI diffusion models should be used within a framework of critical quality assurance for quality and accuracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 63-67 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Keywords
- generative artificial intelligence
- image quality
- medical imaging
- nuclear medicine