Four functions for four relationships : consensus definitions of university students

Peter K. Jonason

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this study (N = 192; 124 women, 68 men), consensus definitions of one-night stands, booty-call relationships, friends-with-benefits, and serious romantic relationships were fashioned using a sample of university students. Participants provided a Likert and forced-choice assessment of how each relationship was characterized by the functions of sexual gratification, trial run, placeholder, and socioemotional support. Serious romantic relationships were primarily used to gain socioemotional support. Friends-with-benefits relationships were motivated by seeking a placeholder until someone better came along and as a trial run for a more serious relationship. Booty-call relationships and one-night stands were motivated primarily by a desire for sexual gratification. Men ascribed a greater range of reasons to engage in sexual relationships than women did and the more short-term the relationship was in nature, the greater the emergence of sex differences in ascribed functions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1407-1414
    Number of pages8
    JournalArchives of Sexual Behavior
    Volume42
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Four functions for four relationships : consensus definitions of university students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this