From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution : towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China

Zhiqiong June Wang, Jianfu Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since 1978, we have observed the steady development of institutions, mechanisms and processes of dispute resolution in China. In the last ten years or so, we then noted frequent issuance of new rules and measures as well as revision of existing laws, the promotion of mediation as the preferred method for resolving disputes and, more recently, the promotion of an integrated dispute-resolution system as a national strategy for comprehensive social control (as well as for resolving disputes), in the name of reforming and strengthening ‘the Mechanism for Pluralist Dispute Resolution’. Careful examination of these latest developments suggests that fundamental changes are taking place that may potentially alter the course of the development of the Chinese dispute-resolution system. These developments are the focus of this paper with an aim to ascertain the nature of the developments and their future direction or directions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-180
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • dispute resolution (law)
  • law and legislation
  • mediation
  • social control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution : towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this