Gender differences in the construction and experience of cancer care : the consequences of the gendered positioning of carers

Jane M. Ussher, Mirjana Sandoval

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The experience and construction of caring in 50 informal cancer carers, 35 women and 15 men, was examined using a critical realist approach and a mixed method design. Women reported higher rates of depression, anxiety, unmet needs and burden of care than men. No gender differences were found in time spent care-giving, suggesting that gendered roles are implicated in distress and coping. Semi-structured interviews with 13 carers were used to identify gender differences in caring, analysed using positioning theory. Women described being positioned as all encompassing expert carers, expected to be competent at decision-making, a range of physical caring tasks, and provision of emotional support for the person with cancer. The consequences of this positioning were over-responsibility and self-sacrifice, physical costs and overwhelming emotions, which were self-silenced. In contrast, men carers positioned caring as a competency task which they had mastered, and which provided them with satisfaction, with the emotions of the person with cancer, or their own emotions, being negative aspects of caring. It is concluded that cancer caring is tied to gendered constructions and expectations, with considerable implications for psychological well-being and coping, and for carer support services, which need to take gender issues on board.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages19
    JournalPsychology & Health
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • cancer
    • care of the sick
    • carers
    • patients
    • sex differences
    • sex role

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in the construction and experience of cancer care : the consequences of the gendered positioning of carers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this