TY - JOUR
T1 - Generalised additive model-based regional flood frequency analysis
T2 - parameter regression technique using generalised extreme value distribution
AU - Rima, Laura
AU - Haddad, Khaled
AU - Rahman, Ataur
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - This study examines the effectiveness of Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) and log-log linear models for estimating the parameters of the generalised extreme value (GEV) distribution, which are then used to estimate flood quantiles in ungauged catchments. This is known as the parameter regression technique (PRT). Using data from 88 gauged catchments in New South Wales, Australia, flood quantiles were estimated for various annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) of 50%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2%, and 1%, corresponding to return periods of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 years, denoted by Q2, Q5, Q10, Q20, Q50, and Q100, respectively. These flood quantiles were then used as dependent variables, while several catchment characteristics served as independent variables in the regression. GAMs were employed to capture non-linearities in flood generation processes. This study evaluates different GAMs and log-log linear models, identifying the best ones based on significant predictors and various statistical metrics using a leave-one-out (LOO) validation approach. The results indicate that GAMs provide more accurate and reliable predictions of flood quantiles compared to the log-log linear models, demonstrating better performance in capturing observed values across different quantiles. The absolute median relative error percentage (REr%) ranges from 33% to 39% for the GAMs and from 36% to 45% for the log-log models. GAMs demonstrate better performance compared to the log-log linear models for quantiles Q2, Q5, Q10, Q20, and Q50; however, their performances appear to be similar for Q100.
AB - This study examines the effectiveness of Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) and log-log linear models for estimating the parameters of the generalised extreme value (GEV) distribution, which are then used to estimate flood quantiles in ungauged catchments. This is known as the parameter regression technique (PRT). Using data from 88 gauged catchments in New South Wales, Australia, flood quantiles were estimated for various annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) of 50%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2%, and 1%, corresponding to return periods of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 years, denoted by Q2, Q5, Q10, Q20, Q50, and Q100, respectively. These flood quantiles were then used as dependent variables, while several catchment characteristics served as independent variables in the regression. GAMs were employed to capture non-linearities in flood generation processes. This study evaluates different GAMs and log-log linear models, identifying the best ones based on significant predictors and various statistical metrics using a leave-one-out (LOO) validation approach. The results indicate that GAMs provide more accurate and reliable predictions of flood quantiles compared to the log-log linear models, demonstrating better performance in capturing observed values across different quantiles. The absolute median relative error percentage (REr%) ranges from 33% to 39% for the GAMs and from 36% to 45% for the log-log models. GAMs demonstrate better performance compared to the log-log linear models for quantiles Q2, Q5, Q10, Q20, and Q50; however, their performances appear to be similar for Q100.
KW - floods
KW - GAM
KW - parameter
KW - quantile regression
KW - rainfall
KW - regional flood frequency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216119234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/w17020206
DO - 10.3390/w17020206
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216119234
SN - 2073-4441
VL - 17
JO - Water (Switzerland)
JF - Water (Switzerland)
IS - 2
M1 - 206
ER -