TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographical variation in diabetes prevalence and detection in China : multilevel spatial analysis of 98,058 adults
AU - Zhou, Maigeng
AU - Astell-Burt, Thomas
AU - Bi, Yufang
AU - Feng, Xiaoqi
AU - Jiang, Yong
AU - Li, Yichong
AU - Page, Andrew
AU - Wang, Limin
AU - Xu, Yu
AU - Zhao, Wenhua
AU - Ning, Guang
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Self-report and biomedical data were collected from98,058 adults aged "¡18 years (90.5% response) from 162 areas spanning mainland China. Diabetes status was assessed using American Diabetes Association criteria. Among those with diabetes, detection was defined by prior diagnosis. Choropleth maps were used to visually assess geographical variation in each outcome at the provincial level. The odds of each outcome were assessed usingmultilevel logistic regression, with adjustment for person- and area-level characteristics. RESULTS: Geographic visualization at the provincial level indicated widespread variation in diabetes prevalence and detection across China. Regional prevalence adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) ranged from 8.3% (95% CI 7.2%, 9.7%) in the northeast to 12.7% (11.1%, 14.6%) in the north. A clear negative gradient in diabetes prevalence was observed from13.1%(12.0%, 14.4%) in the urban high-SEC to 8.7% (7.8%, 9.6%) in rural low-SEC counties/districts. Adjusting for health literacy and other person-level characteristics only partially attenuated these geographic variations. Only one-third of participants living with diabetes had been previously diagnosed, but this also varied substantively by geography. Regional detection adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural SEC, for example, spanned from 40.4% (34.9%, 46.3%) in the north to 15.6% (11.7%, 20.5%) in the southwest. Compared with detection of 40.8% (37.3%, 44.4%) in urban high-SEC counties, detection was poorest among rural low-SEC counties at just 20.5% (17.7%, 23.7%). Person-level characteristics did not fully account for these geographic variations in diabetes detection. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for addressing diabetes risk and improving detection require geographical targeting.
AB - RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Self-report and biomedical data were collected from98,058 adults aged "¡18 years (90.5% response) from 162 areas spanning mainland China. Diabetes status was assessed using American Diabetes Association criteria. Among those with diabetes, detection was defined by prior diagnosis. Choropleth maps were used to visually assess geographical variation in each outcome at the provincial level. The odds of each outcome were assessed usingmultilevel logistic regression, with adjustment for person- and area-level characteristics. RESULTS: Geographic visualization at the provincial level indicated widespread variation in diabetes prevalence and detection across China. Regional prevalence adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) ranged from 8.3% (95% CI 7.2%, 9.7%) in the northeast to 12.7% (11.1%, 14.6%) in the north. A clear negative gradient in diabetes prevalence was observed from13.1%(12.0%, 14.4%) in the urban high-SEC to 8.7% (7.8%, 9.6%) in rural low-SEC counties/districts. Adjusting for health literacy and other person-level characteristics only partially attenuated these geographic variations. Only one-third of participants living with diabetes had been previously diagnosed, but this also varied substantively by geography. Regional detection adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural SEC, for example, spanned from 40.4% (34.9%, 46.3%) in the north to 15.6% (11.7%, 20.5%) in the southwest. Compared with detection of 40.8% (37.3%, 44.4%) in urban high-SEC counties, detection was poorest among rural low-SEC counties at just 20.5% (17.7%, 23.7%). Person-level characteristics did not fully account for these geographic variations in diabetes detection. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for addressing diabetes risk and improving detection require geographical targeting.
KW - China
KW - diabetes
KW - socioeconomics
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:30379
U2 - 10.2337/dc14-1100
DO - 10.2337/dc14-1100
M3 - Article
C2 - 25352654
SN - 0149-5992
VL - 38
SP - 72
EP - 81
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 1
ER -