"GirlsDoPorn" : online pornography and politics of responsibility for technology facilitated sexual exploitation

Ashlee Gore, Leisha Du Preez

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2020, a U.S court ruled that the pornography company GirlsDoPorn, which specialises in the genre of "amateur"-style porn, defrauded and trafficked 22 women through varying degrees of force and coercion. While the women were successful in suing the company directly for damages, there remains an ongoing concern around the implications for the larger platform that hosted, and continues to host, this material-Pornhub (owned by tech company "MindGeek"). Using the GirlsDoPorn and MindGeek partnership as an example, this chapter offers a critical feminist socio-cultural theorisation of the politics of (non)responsibility. We argue that this must be conceptualised as operating within the combined rationalities of "postfeminism" reactive formations of popular misogyny, and technocapitalism, in ways that both facilitated the exploitative practices of "GirlsDoPorn" and offered a problematic cultural carte blanche for companies and platforms like Pornhub and MindGeek to construct (non)responsibility for gendered harms.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPalgrave Handbook of Gendered Violence and Technology
EditorsAnastasia Powell, Asher Flynn, Lisa Sugiura
Place of PublicationSwitzerland
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages651-671
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9783030837341
ISBN (Print)9783030837334
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"GirlsDoPorn" : online pornography and politics of responsibility for technology facilitated sexual exploitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this