Abstract
The article examines the legal debates about where fairness and security considerations may appear to conflict at times. It provides a background to the development of the dock in courtrooms as well as the U.S. government's experience of abolishing the dock since 1300 to 1850. It examines the glass-enclosed security dock, reviewing its development and the way it was handled in two appeal court process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 467-495 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Chicago-Kent Law Review |
Volume | 86 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |