Good intentions, poor execution? Why current workplace policies on menstrual and menopausal health fall short

Anne Reinhardt, Hannah Adler, Danielle Howe, Amelia K. Mardon, Michelle O’Shea, Mike Armour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Menstrual and menopausal workplace policies are vital for equity and well-being at the workplace—but remain uneven, underdeveloped, and rarely evaluated. While menopause has gained attention, menstruation and menstrual disorders are often overlooked. This commentary explores why menopause has become the more “acceptable” entry point and how this reflects broader stigma and power dynamics. We argue for inclusive, evidence-based policies that (1) address menstrual stigma, (2) promote leadership awareness, (3) use intersectional, participatory approaches, (4) embed thorough evaluation frameworks, and (5) go beyond leave policies to reframe reproductive health as a shared organizational concern and not as an individual burden.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalWomen's Reproductive Health
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2025

Keywords

  • menopause
  • menstrual disorders
  • Menstruation
  • stigma
  • workplace policies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good intentions, poor execution? Why current workplace policies on menstrual and menopausal health fall short'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this