Abstract
Menstrual and menopausal workplace policies are vital for equity and well-being at the workplace—but remain uneven, underdeveloped, and rarely evaluated. While menopause has gained attention, menstruation and menstrual disorders are often overlooked. This commentary explores why menopause has become the more “acceptable” entry point and how this reflects broader stigma and power dynamics. We argue for inclusive, evidence-based policies that (1) address menstrual stigma, (2) promote leadership awareness, (3) use intersectional, participatory approaches, (4) embed thorough evaluation frameworks, and (5) go beyond leave policies to reframe reproductive health as a shared organizational concern and not as an individual burden.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Women's Reproductive Health |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- menopause
- menstrual disorders
- Menstruation
- stigma
- workplace policies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Good intentions, poor execution? Why current workplace policies on menstrual and menopausal health fall short'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver