Has the process causing noninsulin dependent diabetes start at birth? Evidence in neonates from a population with a high prevalence of diabetes.

D. Simmons, J. Baker, A. James, A. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: to investigate whether differences in the glucose-insulin axis are present at birth in neonates from ethnic groups at high risk of diabetes. METHODS: fructosamine samples were taken from Maori, European and Pacific Island expectant mothers at their 28 week appointment at the public outpatients clinic at National Women's Hospital, Auckland. Umbilical cord samples for insulin, C-peptide and fructosamine assay were taken at delivery and babies had their subscapular skinfold fat thickness measured by callipers. RESULTS: the mean maternal 28 week fructosamine was similar in the three populations in spite of a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes among Pacific Islanders. Of the 1066 deliveries, cord samples were available for 207 Europeans, 81 Maoris and 113 Pacific Islanders. Both Pacific Island and Maori babies had higher cord fructosamine concentrations than European babies. However, Pacific Island babies were also heavier, and had higher cord insulin concentrations and subscapular skinfold thickness than European babies. CONCLUSIONS: the elevated cord fructosamine concentrations suggest that Maori and Pacific Island babies, who share a high risk of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus later in life, are hyperglycaemic at birth. The paradoxical insulin results and the cause for the relative neonatal hyperglycemia warrant further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-328
Number of pages3
JournalThe New Zealand Medical Journal
Volume105
Issue number940
Publication statusPublished - 26 Aug 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Has the process causing noninsulin dependent diabetes start at birth? Evidence in neonates from a population with a high prevalence of diabetes.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this