Abstract
Despite the disciplinary distances between heritage and the visual arts, there is much the two knowledge practices share. They exist within a shared visual culture; they share a material culture approach to history and the idea that objects bear the imprint of something else (history, aesthetics, the nation, social relationships, identity etc.); they share the object/language/representation conundrums; they are both shaped by discourse and share elements of those discourses; they share particular constructions of historical time/place (Baroque Rome, Renaissance Florence, Islamic Granada, Colonial Melbourne); both share a problematic relationship with history and archaeology as discrete disciplines; and both can be viewed as performative. The list can be extended. Nevertheless, despite the inextricable interweaving noted at the outset of this chapter, as a research agenda within heritage studies, the visual arts has an uneasy existence, ever present and yet ever lurking in a type of research twilight zone with only partial visibility and substance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research |
Editors | Emma Waterton, Steve Watson |
Place of Publication | U.K. |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
Pages | 205-218 |
Number of pages | 14 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781137293565 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781137293558 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- art
- cultural property
- heritage