Heritage and the visual arts

Russell Staiff

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the disciplinary distances between heritage and the visual arts, there is much the two knowledge practices share. They exist within a shared visual culture; they share a material culture approach to history and the idea that objects bear the imprint of something else (history, aesthetics, the nation, social relationships, identity etc.); they share the object/language/representation conundrums; they are both shaped by discourse and share elements of those discourses; they share particular constructions of historical time/place (Baroque Rome, Renaissance Florence, Islamic Granada, Colonial Melbourne); both share a problematic relationship with history and archaeology as discrete disciplines; and both can be viewed as performative. The list can be extended. Nevertheless, despite the inextricable interweaving noted at the outset of this chapter, as a research agenda within heritage studies, the visual arts has an uneasy existence, ever present and yet ever lurking in a type of research twilight zone with only partial visibility and substance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPalgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research
EditorsEmma Waterton, Steve Watson
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages205-218
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781137293565
ISBN (Print)9781137293558
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • art
  • cultural property
  • heritage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heritage and the visual arts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this