Historicising perceptions and the national management framework for invasive alien plants in South Africa

Brett M. Bennett, Lance Van Sittert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers a historical framework for understanding changes to human perceptions and efforts to manage invasive alien plants and weeds in South Africa from the mid-nineteenth century until the present. The article argues that South African legislation and policy for managing invasive alien plants and weeds has historically been limited because people have held contradictory values about plants, many private land owners have lacked resources and have not been compelled to follow government legislation and because policy has reflected the interests of a small group of farmers or scientific experts who have had limited influence on most private land owners and traditional land users. Successful control efforts often relied on technical expertise that was applied controversially or could be implemented on government land without extensive public consultation or social conflict. The creation of a national framework for invasive alien plants through the Working for Water Programme in 1995 and National Environmental Management of Biodiversity Act (no. 10) of 2004 (NEMBA) has increased public awareness, but the Programme and NEMBA remain limited by many of the same institutional and social constraints that experts and institutions faced in the past. In conclusion, the article draws on history to provide insights to contemporary challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-181
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume229
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • South Africa
  • Working for Water Programme
  • introduced organisms
  • social life and customs
  • weeds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Historicising perceptions and the national management framework for invasive alien plants in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this