How do clinicians' professional bodies characterise interprofessional care?

Ann Dadich, Sharon Williams, Rebecca Wells, Shane Scahill, Nazim Taskin, Stephanie Best

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

Interprofessional care represents international best practice. Despite evidence of what works to promote it, interprofessional care does not always occur. This might be partly because much research myopically examines health or social care teams, health services, and/or education. This study addresses this by examining how clinicians' professional bodies characterise interprofessional care. An examination of the official websites of 25 professional bodies, spanning five professions and five nations found that, with few exceptions, the strategic foci of these professional bodies did not explicitly recognise the role of counterpart professions. Furthermore, references to these counterparts and interprofessional teamwork were somewhat embedded within the websites and not readily apparent. This suggests considerable opportunity to promote interprofessional care via clinicians' professional bodies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 33rd Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Wicked Solutions to Wicked Problems: The Challenges Facing Management Research and Practice, 3-6 December 2019, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
PublisherANZAM
Pages419-432
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9780648110958
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management. International Conference -
Duration: 3 Dec 2019 → …

Conference

ConferenceAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management. International Conference
Period3/12/19 → …

Keywords

  • health services administration
  • health care teams
  • social service

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do clinicians' professional bodies characterise interprofessional care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this