How do you like your regulation : hard or soft? : the Antarctic Treaty and the Outer Space Treaty compared

Steven Freeland, Anja Nakarada Pecujlic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The end of world war II simultaneously turned into the beginning of a new global conflict"” the Cold war. The manifestations of the conflict between its two main proponents, the United States of America ('USA') and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics ('USSR'), were propelled by the possibilities offered by modern technology (nuclear weapons, missile technology, computers, and satellites), and included interventions, proxy wars, and the struggle for natural resources. However, periods of confrontation and crises were succeeded by more stable periods of negotiation, coexistence, and competition. Two 'non-territorial' areas, Antarctica and Outer Space, which came into focus during the second phase of the Cold war (1953-1969), become examples of an attempt to refrain from confrontation. with respect to these areas, the two proponents as well as a majority of other States had to set aside their territorial/appropriation ambitions in favor of international cooperative management regimes, at the very least. This attempt was ultimately codified by the Antarctic Treaty (1959) and the Outer Space Treaty (1967).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-36
Number of pages26
JournalNational Law School of India Review
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • The Antarctic Treaty (1959)
  • The Outer Space Treaty (1967)
  • international cooperation
  • international law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do you like your regulation : hard or soft? : the Antarctic Treaty and the Outer Space Treaty compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this