(How) does knowledge flow? : a critical analysis of intra-organizational knowledge transfer

Raza Mir, Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, Ali Mir

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    In this chapter, we argue that the discourse of knowledge transfer in organizational studies fails to record in the manner in which this transfer is implicated in the historical experiences of power differences and economic imbalances that undergrid the international encounter. The chapter draws on an empirical study of several months conducted by the first author in India, an ethnographic examination of the work practices of the subsidiary of a large US-based multinational corporation (MNC), which we have named Chloron Corporation. This chapter is a story of our attempts to make sense of the sea of data collected during this endeavour, through analysis of a single episode of knowledge transfer. The rest of the chapter is organized in three sections. In the first, we critically survey the representations of knowledge transfer in organizational research. We then present empirical research conducted at Chloron, to highlight the complete disjuncture between the theoretical descriptions of knowledge transfer and the empirical realities of corporate experience. In the final section, we theoretically analyze the research vignette to arrive at a different approach to knowledge transfer than that of mainstream research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationOrganizations, Markets and Imperial Formations: Towards an Anthropology of Globalization
    EditorsSubhabrata Bobby Banerjee, Vanessa C. M. Chio, Raza Mir
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherEdward Elgar
    Pages98-131
    Number of pages34
    ISBN (Print)9781848443174
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '(How) does knowledge flow? : a critical analysis of intra-organizational knowledge transfer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this