TY - JOUR
T1 - How to read and critically appraise a reliability article
AU - Bialocerkowski, Andrea
AU - Klupp, Nerida
AU - Bragge, Peter
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background: This article is a guide to critically appraising reliability studies based upon fundamental reliability concepts. It focuses on reliability studies of physical measurement instruments used in the allied health professions. Content: Eight critical appraisal questions specific to reliability studies are outlined, and their theoretical basis and importance described. The questions encompass key aspects of reliability theory; selection of clinically stable participants appropriate to the instrument and condition of interest; minimization of random error; appropriate periods of time between measurements; the interpretation of frequently used reliability statistics; and the generalizability of results. The importance of interpreting reliability studies in specific clinical contexts and settings is emphasized. Conclusions: These questions will guide clinicians and researchers to make informed decisions regarding whether reliability evidence can be applied to their specific context.
AB - Background: This article is a guide to critically appraising reliability studies based upon fundamental reliability concepts. It focuses on reliability studies of physical measurement instruments used in the allied health professions. Content: Eight critical appraisal questions specific to reliability studies are outlined, and their theoretical basis and importance described. The questions encompass key aspects of reliability theory; selection of clinically stable participants appropriate to the instrument and condition of interest; minimization of random error; appropriate periods of time between measurements; the interpretation of frequently used reliability statistics; and the generalizability of results. The importance of interpreting reliability studies in specific clinical contexts and settings is emphasized. Conclusions: These questions will guide clinicians and researchers to make informed decisions regarding whether reliability evidence can be applied to their specific context.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/558756
U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.3.46743
DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.3.46743
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-1645
VL - 17
SP - 114
EP - 120
JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -