TY - JOUR
T1 - Human health and wellbeing in environmental impact assessment in New South Wales, Australia
T2 - Auditing health impacts within environmental assessments of major projects
AU - Harris, Patrick J.
AU - Harris, Elizabeth
AU - Thompson, Susan
AU - Harris-Roxas, Ben
AU - Kemp, Lynn
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - Internationally the inclusion of health within environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been shown to be limited. While Australian EIA documentation has not been studied empirically to date, deficiencies in practice have been documented. This research developed an audit tool to undertake a qualitative descriptive analysis of 22 Major Project EAs in New South Wales, Australia. Results showed that health and wellbeing impacts were not considered explicitly. They were, however, included indirectly in the identification of traditional public health exposures associated with the physical environment and to a lesser extent the inclusion of social and economic impacts. However, no health data was used to inform any of the assessments, there was no reference to causal pathways between exposures or determinants and physical or mental health effects, and there was no inclusion of the differential distribution of exposures or health impacts on different populations. The results add conceptually and practically to the long standing integration debate, showing that health is in a position to add value to the EIA process as an explicit part of standard environmental, social and economic considerations. However, to overcome the consistently documented barriers to integrating health in EIA, capacity must be developed amongst EIA professionals, led by the health sector, to progress health related knowledge and tools.
AB - Internationally the inclusion of health within environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been shown to be limited. While Australian EIA documentation has not been studied empirically to date, deficiencies in practice have been documented. This research developed an audit tool to undertake a qualitative descriptive analysis of 22 Major Project EAs in New South Wales, Australia. Results showed that health and wellbeing impacts were not considered explicitly. They were, however, included indirectly in the identification of traditional public health exposures associated with the physical environment and to a lesser extent the inclusion of social and economic impacts. However, no health data was used to inform any of the assessments, there was no reference to causal pathways between exposures or determinants and physical or mental health effects, and there was no inclusion of the differential distribution of exposures or health impacts on different populations. The results add conceptually and practically to the long standing integration debate, showing that health is in a position to add value to the EIA process as an explicit part of standard environmental, social and economic considerations. However, to overcome the consistently documented barriers to integrating health in EIA, capacity must be developed amongst EIA professionals, led by the health sector, to progress health related knowledge and tools.
KW - Environmental impact assessment
KW - Health
KW - Major projects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349239805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67349239805
SN - 0195-9255
VL - 29
SP - 310
EP - 318
JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
IS - 5
ER -